ADMINISTRATIVE THEORIES
ADMINISTRATIVE THEORIES IT’S SIGNIFICANCE IN MY VIEW
Administrative
theories given by Taylor and Fayol in the early year were such that it aims at
dehumanizing the human resource working in any organization.
Taylor
focused on the micro aspect of the organization and Fayol focus on the macro
aspect. One took the scientific aspect and the other one took the aspect of
improving the top management.
One thing
was very common in the two kind of study that was the aspect of Mechanization of
the worker and the work environment. To bring efficiency of work and the best
output they just forgot to take care of humanitarian aspect of the most important
resource, i.e., the human resource for whom the efficiency and output is all
about. This brings out the benefit to the capitalist at the cost of the craftsmanship
of the human being. Mechanization of work environment and human beings in the
name of quality and quantity adversely affects the creativity of the worker in
long run. So, bring out the mental development of the work force and friendly
environment. The above-mentioned theories were thrown out after some time by
the scholars of Public administrations but in practice most of the
organizations try to follow the same in their organization. These
implementations can give them short term profit but they will remain losers in
long run. This is a very elaborative aspect but they can notice themselves if
the closely monitor the employment trend in their offices and final output in comparison
to the humanitarian giants in the market.
Some aspects
need to be ignored to maintain the ethical and devoted but sensitive employees
in the game. Sensitivity can bring quality loss in short span but big benefit in
the long run.
The article is written as per my B.A. major studies of public administration and my work experience in various environments.
ReplyDelete